Davis v. B & S, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “the mere fact that the bartenders may have received money from the tip pool but were not required to contribute to the pool does not render the pool invalid as a matter of law”
• “The ultimate question facing the Court in the ‘economic reality’ inquiry is whether the individual had control over the alleged FLSA violation.”
• “because issues of fact remain as to whether [the general manager] was a ‘tipped employee’ with regard to his work with the disc jockeys, the validity of his participation in the tip pool ... cannot be resolved as a matter of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).