Skip to main content
· 4/28/2008

Davis v. Advocate Health Center Patient Care Express

Citations

  • 523 F.3d 681
  • 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2048
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9163
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,176
  • 2008 WL 1848333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring for finality only “that the district court is done with the case”
  • requiring for finality only “that the district court is done with the case”
  • “When a judge conditionally dismisses a suit, but gives the plaintiff time to fix the problem that led to dismissal (here, the payment of the filing fee
  • “We therefore construe USERRA liberally in favor of veterans seeking its protections.”
  • “When a judge conditionally dis‐ misses a suit, but gives the plaintiff time to fix the problem that led to dismissal … the order becomes an appealable ‘final decision’ once the time for correction has expired, whether or not the court enters a final judgment.”
  • “When a judge conditionally dismisses a suit, but gives the plaintiff time to fix the problem that led to dismissal . . . the order becomes an appealable ‘final decision’ once the time for correction has expired, whether or not the court enters a final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.