· 4/28/2008
Davis v. Advocate Health Center Patient Care Express
Citations
- 523 F.3d 681
- 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2048
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9163
- 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,176
- 2008 WL 1848333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring for finality only “that the district court is done with the case”
- requiring for finality only “that the district court is done with the case”
- “When a judge conditionally dismisses a suit, but gives the plaintiff time to fix the problem that led to dismissal (here, the payment of the filing fee
- “We therefore construe USERRA liberally in favor of veterans seeking its protections.”
- “When a judge conditionally dis‐ misses a suit, but gives the plaintiff time to fix the problem that led to dismissal … the order becomes an appealable ‘final decision’ once the time for correction has expired, whether or not the court enters a final judgment.”
- “When a judge conditionally dismisses a suit, but gives the plaintiff time to fix the problem that led to dismissal . . . the order becomes an appealable ‘final decision’ once the time for correction has expired, whether or not the court enters a final judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.