Davis Oil Company v. William P. Mills, Iii, William P. Mills, III v. Davis Oil Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “to the extent that the district court’s holding [in Mid-State Homes ] ... implies that [required notice statute] would be constitutionally adequate as the sole determinant of parties entitled to notice of the seizure of property, we expressly reject that reasoning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).