Skip to main content
· 10/5/1981

Davis & Cox v. Summa Corp.

Citations

  • 454 U.S. 834
  • 70 L. Ed. 2d 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • request for applications filed on general subject matter of patent in suit; court held, “no specific showing of direct relevance or particularized need has been made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.