· 2/23/2006
Davis & Associates v. Williams
Citations
- 892 A.2d 1144
- 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 83
- 2006 WL 407708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Tjhere is no doubt that [plaintiffs] claim for money due from the District for services it rendered under the contract constitute a claim related to its contract with the District.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Wagner, Steadman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.