Skip to main content
· 7/10/1920

Davies v. Lutz

Citations

  • 107 Kan. 199
  • 191 P. 485
  • 1920 Kan. LEXIS 44

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Mortgage Foreclosure — Parts of Petition Stricken Out — No Prejudicial Error — Judicial Discretion. The striking out or retaining of profuse and unnecessary averments in a pleading is largely within the discretion of the court, and where an order to strike is made, which leaves in the pleading sufficient to enable a party to present all of its claims or defenses, no prejudicial error is committed.</p> <p>2. Same. — No Abuse of Judicial Discretion. Under the rule stated, it is held that the striking out of portions of defendants’ answer and cross petition furnishes no ground for a reversal.</p>

Judges: Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.