Davies v. Genesis Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Deeming as critical the question of where consumers of anesthesiology services could reasonably turn for alternate care
• finding a narrow market for cardiac anesthesiology insufficient as a matter of law for, inter alia, failure to include any allegations distinguishing the cardiac anesthesiology market from the broader anesthesiology market
• finding plaintiffs’ geographic market was too narrow as a matter of law where the complaint failed to consider the impact of a high quality hospital located 56 miles from the Quad Cities
• “an enterprise may be an association in fact, i.e., more than one entity or individuals that are associated although not a legal entity.”
• Allegations in the complaint must adequately identify a relevant geographic market, taking into consideration “blatant geographic and commercial realities”
• Allegations in the complaint must adequately identify a relevant geographic market, taking into consideration “blatant geographic and commercial realities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).