Davies v. Carey
Citations
- 72 Wash. 537
- 130 P. 1137
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1508
Syllabus
<p>Frauds, Statute or — Oral Promise to Pay Debt of Another— Original Undertaking — Consideration. Where tbe owner of timber sold tbe same to a logger, to be paid for as removed, and was interested in tbe logging operations to the extent that bis profits depended thereon, bis promise to a merchant, supplying tbe logger with goods for tbe camp, to pay tbe balance due on tbe account and also to pay for all merchandise thereafter furnished, in case credit was extended and goods supplied for tbe operations, is a direct and original undertaking on a sufficient consideration and not a promise to pay tbe debt of another; and hence is not within tbe statute of frauds.</p> <p>Husband and Wife — Community Debts — Judgment—Form. In an action against a husband and wife upon a community debt contracted by the husband alone, a judgment in form against both husband and wife, is erroneous, since it is enforceable against the wife as her separate debt, and should be against her as a member of the community only.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a judgment against husband and wife erroneous in sofaras it awarded recovery against a wife individually, rather than solely as a member of the marital community
- promisor benefited from keeping debtor's logging operation going
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Douglas Northwest, Inc. v. Bill O'Brien & Sons Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-13· cited 46×
- Washington Printing Co. v. OsnerWashington Supreme Court· 1918-01-17· cited 12×
- Lovell v. HayeWashington Supreme Court· 1915-04-14· cited 9×
- Grayson v. PlatisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-19· cited 8×
- Campbell v. Weston Basket & Barrel Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1915-08-20· cited 7×
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Hite Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-03-08· cited 5×
- Pressentin v. Hawkeye Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1914-01-17· cited 4×
- South Sound National Bank v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-12-19· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court· 1910-11-16· cited 25×
- Burns v. Bradford-Kennedy Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-12-20· cited 18×
- Goldie-Klenert Distributing Co. v. BothwellWashington Supreme Court· 1912-02-20· cited 18×
- McKenzie v. Puget Sound National BankWashington Supreme Court· 1894-07-26· cited 9×
- White v. RatliffWashington Supreme Court· 1910-12-30· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.