Daviero v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when a defendant’s “conviction can be sustained on any one of the § 922(g) categories, this court need not address” whether the conviction can also be sustained under a different § 922(g) category
• declining to consider arguments about § 922(g)(3)’s constitutionality after finding evidence sufficient to sustain conviction under § 922(g)(8)
• finding any error made by a district court in calculating the guidelines range to be harmless because the district court extensively considered the § 3553(a
• “Incorrect application of the Guidelines is harmless error where the district court specifies the resolution of a particular issue did not affect the ultimate determination of a sentence.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).