Davidson v. Stuart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Jennings \left untouched the Ninth Circuit's requirement of [bond hearings every six months] for immigrants detained under section 1231(a)(6).\
• holding that clear and convincing evidence standard applies to bond hearings for noncitizens detained pursuant to section 1231(a)(6)
• holding that clear and convincing evidence standard applies to bond hearings for noncitizens detained pursuant to section 1231(a)(6)
• “Jennings . . . left untouched the Ninth Circuit’s requirement of such hearings for immigrants detained under 16 section 1231(a)(6).”
• “Jennings . . . left 1 If noncitizens who are held in custody under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1226(a) or 1231(a)(6
• conditions of supervision relevant to assessment of whether clear and convincing evidence standard was satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).