Davidson v. Streeter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the presumptive invalidity of [a] transaction on the ground of constructive fraud, where an attorney deals with his client for the former’s benefit, can be overcome only by the clearest and most satisfactory evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).