Skip to main content

Davidson v. State

Citations

  • 763 N.E.2d 441
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 144
  • 2002 WL 241136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining Seay is “no longer the law by reason of 1994 amendments to the statute governing consecutive sentences”
  • party appealing negative judgment must establish unconflicted evidence unmistakably and unerringly points to conclusion contrary to judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Sullivan, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.