Davidson v. Shoney's Big Boy Restaurant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unless state law “plainly and specifically” authorizes inconsistent state and local regulation, it would be “illogical” to assume that result
• unless state law “plainly and specifically” authorizes inconsistent state and local regulation, it would be “illogical” to assume that result
• termination of an epileptic restaurant employee violated the employee’s rights where the employer did not base the termination on individualized evaluation of the employee’s condition and work history
• “[T]o satisfy the standard of a serious threat to one’s health or safety, the employer must establish that it relied upon competent medical advice that there exists a reasonably probable risk of serious harm.”
• “[T]o satisfy the standard of a serious threat to one’s health or safety, the employer must establish that it relied upon competent medical advice that there exists a reasonably probable risk of serious harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).