Davidson v. Prince

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly exelud-ed, as impermissible legal conclusion, testimony that defendant was negligent
• collecting cases and affirming the trial court's decision to exclude expert testimony that would have answered a specific question on the verdict form that the jury needed to answer \based upon the judge's definition of a legal term 'negligence' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).