Davidson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a petitioner’s argument that application of Section 6138(a) of the Parole Code is a violation of the constitutional separation of powers doctrine
• denial of credit to a recommitted direct violator for time spent at liberty on parole does not violate the separation of powers doctrine
• wherein this Court, relying on Young, found that the Board did not violate the separation of powers doctrine by recommitting a convicted parole violator without credit for time served, pursuant to Section 6138 of the Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).