Skip to main content
· 5/3/1890

Davidson v. Ellmaker

Citations

  • 84 Cal. 21
  • 23 P. 1026
  • 1890 Cal. LEXIS 752

Syllabus

<p>Unlawful Detainer — Lease — Signing — Delivery — Execution — Finding. — In an action of unlawful detainer, where the answer admits the signing of a lease by the defendant, hut denies any taking or hiring under the lease, and avers that the signing of it was induced by fraudulent representations, it is necessary that the court should find on the issue as to whether the premises were leased. A finding that defendant signed the lease, without a finding that it was delivered, is insufficient, as the relation of landlord and tenant cannot he created by the mere signing of a lease without delivery. Nor will the use of the word “execute,” in the findings, import a delivery of the lease, if it is apparent that it was used as the mere synonym of the word “sign.”</p> <p>Id. — Lease to Possessor Claiming Title — Estoppel — A lease to one already in possession claiming title, though executed and delivered, will not estop the lessee to dispute the title of the lessor.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disbarring for violating Rule 8.4 (a) (2) based on a federal felony conviction for withholding information on a crime
  • disbarring attorney who vio- lated Rule 8.4(a)(2) by being convicted of one felony count of with- holding information on a crime
  • lawyer disbarred for withholding information of crime
  • lawyer disbarred for withholding information of crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.