Davidson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own regulations
• reading a district regulation to say that a building is not an accessory building “where given its size, design and declared purposes, it can reasonably be expected to duplicate the functions of the main building rather than in fact serving as incidental to those uses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).