Davidson v. Dill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 75% of employment agencies surveyed refused to refer an applicant with an arrest record
• espousing a balancing test for a situation involving an individual who had been arrested for and was subsequently acquitted of loitering
• weighing the individual's right to privacy against the state's interest in maintaining records
• acknowledging acquitted person's constitutional right to privacy in arrest records and holding that a court must balance this right against the state's interest in maintaining such records for law enforcement
• in cease «predating statute, supreme court recognized that harm to acquitted person from refusal to expunge arrest records could outweigh public interest in retaining the records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).