Davidson v. Department of Licensing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert testimony subject to cross-examination is not .necessary before a disciplinary board “almost exclusively composed of experts in the chiropractic field” and “[c]consequently ... entitled to rely on its own specialized knowledge”
• expert testimony subject to cross-examination is not necessary before a disciplinary board \almost exclusively composed of experts in the chiropractic field\ and \[c]consequently . . . entitled to rely on its own specialized knowledge\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).