Davidson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the most important factor in determining the nature of the employment relationship is the control of the manner in which the work is accomplished, and that retention of this control by the hiree indicates the existence of independent contractor relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-23· cited 48×
• Lynch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-02· cited 24×
• Hoffman v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-17· cited 16×
• Sarver Towing v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-05· cited 6×
• Reynolds v. REIHART
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-11· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Isenberg v. California Employment Stabilization Commission
  California Supreme Court· 1947-05-02· cited 68×
• Feller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-01-03· cited 56×
• J. Miller Co. v. Mixter
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-05-25· cited 51×
• JOHNSON v. ANGRETTI
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-05-22· cited 47×
• Clark v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-06-04· cited 23×
• East v. Skelly
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-06-22· cited 11×