Davidson v. Carroll, Hoy & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding, after the D.C. Circuit had remanded plaintiffs’ “damages claims” under the Administrative Procedure Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act, that the mandate rule did not preclude plaintiffs from amending their complaint to add an additional Privacy Act claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).