Davidson v. Bradford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that uninsured motorist was “eligible” for no-fault economic loss benefits and, therefore, was precluded by statute from pleading or recovering in an action for damages against a tortfeasor those damages for which economic loss benefits would have been available
• holding that uninsured motorist was \eligible\ for no-fault economic loss benefits and, therefore, was precluded by statute from pleading or recovering in an action for damages against a tortfeasor those damages for which economic loss benefits would have been available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).