Skip to main content
· 2/24/1988

Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group—Phase I

Citations

  • 747 S.W.2d 373
  • 76 A.L.R. 4th 919
  • 31 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 247
  • 1988 Tex. LEXIS 18
  • 1988 WL 13051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \there is an implied warranty of suitability by the landlord in a commercial lease that the premises are suitable for their intended commercial purpose\
  • stating that because a landlord breached the implied warranty of suitability, the tenant \was therefore justified in abandoning the premises and discontinuing his rent payments\
  • stating that because a landlord breached the implied warranty of suitability, the tenant “was therefore justified in abandoning the premises and discontinuing his rent payments”
  • noting that breach of implied warranty of suitability is ordinarily one of fact, dependent upon several factors
  • stating that because a landlord breached the implied warranty of suitability, the tenant “was therefore justified in abandoning the premises and discontinuing his rent payments”
  • recognizing failure to provide electricity some days, trashy parking lot, and non-working light fixtures in office space as breaching implied warranty of suitability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.