Daviditis v. National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a university’s decision not to publish a master’s thesis because it contained an unprofessional “Disaeknowledgements” section was “properly characterized as an ‘academic’ decision”
• doctoral student’s First Amendment rights were not violated upon committee’s declination to approve “disacknowledgement” portion of thesis
• under the First Amendment, a thesis proposal may be “subject to a reviewing committee’s reasonable regulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).