David W. Olney v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having raised this point unsuccessfully on 7 direct appeal, [petitioner] cannot now seek to 8 relitigate it as part of a petition under § 2255.”
• “Having raised this point unsuccessfully on 20 direct appeal, appellant cannot now seek to relitigate it as part of a petition under § 2255.”
• hearing on motion to suppress is critical stage, “particularly in narcotics cases, where the crucial issue may well be the admissibility of narcotics allegedly found in the possession of the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).