David W. Musgrave v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[e]vidence is not substantial if it is overwhelmed by other evidence in the record\
• holding that because claimant failed to meet his burden of establishing a disability which prevented him from performing his past relevant work, \the ALJ was under no obligation to elicit the testimony of a vocational expert\
• holding evidence not substantial if “overwhelmed by other evidence in the record”
• “Evidence is not substantial if it is overwhelmed by other evidence in the record or constitutes mere conclusion.”
• “Evidence is not substantial if it is overwhelmed by other evidence in the record or constitutes mere conclusion.”
• “Evidence is not substantial if it is overwhelmed by other evidence in the record or constitutes mere conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).