David W. Mahon v. Craven Crowell Johnny H. Hayes William H. Kennoy Skila Harris Glenn L. McCullough Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s back problems did not substantially limit his ability to work in a broad class of jobs
• holding that evidence that plaintiff’s impairment caused a 47 percent loss of access to the job market was insufficient to establish a disability
• holding that the plaintiffs back problems did not substantially limit his ability to work in a broad class of jobs
• recognizing that the Rehabilitation Act explicitly states that ADA standards should apply in cases alleging employment discrimination
• holding that the plaintiff was not substantially restricted in his ability to sit, stand, bend, stoop, walk, climb, or lift even where the record established that the plaintiffs “back impairment causes him distress and limits him in performing some activities”
• holding that the plaintiff was not substantially restricted in his ability to sit, stand, bend, stoop, walk, climb, or lift even where the record established that the plaintiff’s “back impairment causes him distress and limits him in performing some activities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).