David W. Callison v. City of Philadelphia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s requiring employees on FMLA leave to notify the employer when leaving and returning home does not interfere with FMLA
• explaining that, in defending against an FMLA-interference claim, an “employer cannot justify its actions by establishing a 8 legitimate business purpose for its decision”
• finding that there was no interference with FMLA rights where the employee was required to follow an employer's call-in policy, in part because the policy did not conflict with substantive provisions of the FMLA
• stating “[a]n interference action is not about discrimination, it is only about whether the employer provided the employee with the entitlements guaranteed by the FMLA”
• requiring employees on FMLA leave to notify the employer when leaving home and upon return does not interfere with FMLA
• “Nothing in the FMLA prevents employers from ensuring that employees who are on leave from work do not abuse their leave . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).