David v. Vesta Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the equal protection clause forbids only invidious discrimination\
• warning against use of separation-of-powers doctrine with \pedantic rigor\ that would make \the modern administrative agency ... an impossibility in our law\
• warning against use of separation-of-powers doctrine with \pedantic rig- or” that would make \the modern administrative agency ... an impossibility in our law”
• warning against use of separation-of- powers doctrine with “pedantic rigor” that would make “the modern administrative agency . . . an impossibility in our law”
• warning against use of separation-of-powers doctrine with \pedantic rigor\ that would make \the modern administrative agency . . . an impossibility in our law\
• administrative adjudications must be subjected to judicial scrutiny for purposes of separation of powers to prevent unchecked power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).