Skip to main content

David v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 493 S.E.2d 379
  • 26 Va. App. 77
  • 1997 Va. App. LEXIS 715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a trial court abused its discretion when a juror’s rehabilitation consisted solely of the juror’s “mere assent to the court’s leading questions”
  • finding that the use of a peremptory strike did not make the error harmless but also finding that, if the juror would have been rehabilitated from the declared bias, then the circuit court would not have committed a reversable error in refusing to strike her for cause
  • juror impartiality a factual determination, disturbed on appeal only for “manifest error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Willis, Elder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.