David v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• containing a comprehensive discussion of the evolution of implied warranty claims under Florida law
• “The ‘essential purposes’ exception typically has been limited to circumstances involving repeated (unsuccessful) efforts to repair a product that completely fails in its intended use.”
• \Florida law requires privity of contract to sustain a breach of implied warranty claim.\
• “Florida law requires privity of contract to sustain a breach of implied warranty claim”
• “An unjust enrichment claim is one in the nature of quasi-contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).