David v. AM International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sua sponte dismissing action as frivolous as to all defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) even though only some defendants moved to dismiss
• sua sponte dismissing action with prejudice as frivolous as to all defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) even though only some defendants moved to dismiss
• “A plaintiff asserting fantastic or delusional claims should not, by payment of a filing fee, obtain a license to consume limited judicial resources and put defendants to effort and expense.”
• dismissal (S.D.N.Y. 1993), aff'd 41 F.3d 1500 (2d Cir. 1994); cf. Pillay v. for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not a dismissal on I.N.S., 45 F.3d 14, 17 (2d Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (dismissing the merits
• “A plaintiff asserting fantastic or delusional claims should not, by payment of a filing fee, obtain a license to consume limited judicial resources and put defendants to effort and expense. The policies arguing against sua sponte Rule 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).