David v. Aaronson
Citations
- 105 La. 347
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>The testimony makes out a case in which plaintiff and defendant were both at fault. The plaintiff, by connecting himself with an act of extreme violence against the defendant, and the defendant, by afterward charging plaintiff with having committed robbery, a charge not sustained by the testimony.</p> <p>The jury and the judge considered the act of violence as having provoked the unfounded charge, and treating the two offences together, found a verdict denying plaintiff’s demand and a judgment rejecting it.</p> <p>This court affirms the verdict and judgment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the “authorizing statute is as much a part of the ‘expungement’ as is the certificate itself
- noting that D.C. firearms statutes do not track the federal 26 firearms statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Been, Blanchard, Breaux, During, Takes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.