David Tunick, Inc. v. Kornfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding two photo prints, even where produced by the same artist and same plate, to be unique
• “Thus, each print is, by definition, unique. Hence, there can be no exact substitute for a given print purchased by a collector.”
• “In this context it would be fundamentally unfair, and unsound policy, to impose on plaintiff a duty to accept another — inherently different — [work of art] as a substitute for the one plaintiff actually viewed, bid for, and purchased.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).