Sixth Circuit· 8/31/1984

David Tarter v. William Raybuck

Citations

742 F.2d 977
1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19004
19 Educ. L. Rep. 952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“declin[ing] to pass directly on the question of what fourth amendment standards would be applicable where the fruits of a search are turned over to law enforcement officials and used in proceedings against the student searched”
r eversing award of attorney's fees to prevailing defendant in part because legal issue was not well-settled in circuit or country
pre-T.L.O. case where search of student by police officer was initiated and noting that “[t]he presence of the police officers does take this directed by school official
“[i]t is beyond peradven--ture that school children do not shed their constitutional rights at the school house gate.... School officials ... are agents of the government and are constrained by the Fourth Amendment.”
burden on school official claiming student consented to search
Christiansburg standards apply to section 1983 suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Krupansky, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.