Skip to main content
· 8/9/1985

David STUMPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS & SKINNER, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 770 F.2d 93
  • 38 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1114
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22294
  • 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘Summary judgment is notoriously inappropriate for determination of claims in which issues of intent, good faith and other subjective feelings play dominant roles.’”
  • older employee fired in work force reduction needn’t prove replacement by younger employee to state prima facie case
  • “‘Summary judgment is notoriously inappropriate for determination of claims in which issues of intent, good faith and other subjective feelings play dominant roles.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Easterbrook, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.