· 8/9/1985
David STUMPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS & SKINNER, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 770 F.2d 93
- 38 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1114
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22294
- 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,461
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘Summary judgment is notoriously inappropriate for determination of claims in which issues of intent, good faith and other subjective feelings play dominant roles.’”
- older employee fired in work force reduction needn’t prove replacement by younger employee to state prima facie case
- “‘Summary judgment is notoriously inappropriate for determination of claims in which issues of intent, good faith and other subjective feelings play dominant roles.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Easterbrook, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.