David Richard Moon v. Lanson Newsome, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, generally, where a litigant has been forewarned, dismissal for failure to obey a court order is not an abuse of discretion
• holding that dismissal for failure to obey a court order is generally not an abuse of discretion when a litigant has been forewarned
• holding that, generally, where a litigant has been forewarned, dismissal for failure to obey a court order is not an abuse of discretion
• holding that, generally, where a litigant has been forewarned, dismissal for failure to obey a court order is not an abuse of discretion
• concluding that a pro se litigant is subject to a court’s rules and to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
• concluding that a pro se litigant is subject to a court’s rules and to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).