Skip to main content
· 6/7/2024

David Randy Sabby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff could recover actual damages to his non-possessory reversion interest in the subsurface minerals if he could establish actual damages
  • holding that a plaintiff could recover actual damages to his non-possessory reversion interest in the subsurface minerals if he could establish actual damages
  • recognizing that a landowner who leased his mineral rights had standing to sue the drilling company for trespass based upon his possibility of reverter
  • holding that the mineral lessor has only a royalty interest in the minerals
  • noting that the rules for trespass are different on the surface of the earth from those that apply two miles above or below it
  • noting that erroneously admitted internal memo was mentioned by both sides throughout their closing arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.