Skip to main content
· 10/1/1986

David Piercy v. Charles Black, Warden, Nebraska State Prison the Nebraska Board of Parole, Etc.

Citations

  • 801 F.2d 1075
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding prisoner properly exhausted state remedies for two claims and was excused from exhaustion for one claim and thus reaching the claims’ merits
  • finding petitioner suffered no constitutional deprivation where two state sentences were not run concurrently because he “failed to show that either Iowa or Nebraska has created . . . a liberty interest [in concurrent sentencing], and it seems plain that they have not”
  • a decision on the same question of law, under almost identical facts, made state court remedies futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross, Bright, Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.