David Phillips v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the prior dismissal of nine out of ten counts provided a substantial benefit to the defendant in exchange for an appellate waiver
• noting that the prior dismissal of nine out of ten counts provided a substan‐ tial benefit to the defendant in exchange for an appellate waiver
• noting that the prior dismissal of nine out of ten counts provided a substan‐ tial benefit to the defendant in exchange for an appellate waiver
• vacating the district court’s decision on a habeas petitioner’s post-judgment Rule 60(b) motion and instructing the court to dismiss for want of jurisdiction
• “Under Gonzalez, the motion was an ‘application’ for collateral relief. But was it a second application?”
• “Under Gonzalez, the motion was an ‘application’ for collateral relief. But was it a second application?”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).