David Penny v. El Patio, LLC D/B/A El Patio Motel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the petitioner “may introduce new evidence after the petition stage if the evidence is a legiti- mate reply to evidence introduced by the patent owner”
• explaining that the petitioner “may introduce new evidence after the petition stage if the evidence is a legiti- mate reply to evidence introduced by the patent owner”
• explaining that the petitioner “may introduce new evidence after the petition stage if the evidence is a legiti- mate reply to evidence introduced by the patent owner”
• stating petitioner “may introduce new evidence after the petition stage if the evidence is a legitimate reply to evidence introduced by the Case: 22-1340 Document: 50 Page: 25 Filed: 10/16/2023 COREPHOTONICS, LTD. v. APPLE INC. 25 patent owner”
• “There is, however, no blanket prohibition against the introduction of new evi- dence during an inter partes review proceeding.”
• “There is, however, no blanket prohibition against the introduction of new evi- dence during an inter partes review proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).