David Paul Navarro v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor’s argument improperly contained a clear reference to a statement made by defendant which was not admitted into evidence at the State’s request
• defense counsel objected to the disputed closing comments at trial so plain error review was not at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).