David Pals v. Schepel Buick & Gmc Truck, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that backpay is an equitable remedy for the Court, not the jury, to determine
• asserting that back pay, like front pay, is an equitable remedy
• “[f]ront pay and back pay under Title VII and the ADA are ‘equitable’ matters, but they still are dollar values”
• “Back pay and front pay are equitable remedies . . . and therefore matters for the judge . . . . ”
• “[W]hen assessing back pay, or awarding front pay in lieu of reinstatement, the judge must respect the findings implied by the jury’s verdict.”
• “Front pay and back pay under Title VII and the ADA are ‘equitable’ matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).