David Michael Jones v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• psychiatrist’s letter about child custody made in institution of litigation was covered by immunity
• “An order merely denying a motion for summary judgment. . . does not amount to a final judgment and may be modified or changed at any time prior to final judgment”
• \An order merely denying a motion for summary judgment . . . does not amount to a final judgment and may be modified or changed at any time prior to final judgment\
• letter concerning proposed expert testimony in child custody case was privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).