David Mack III v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Robinson-Patman has not ushered in a bizarre rule of law that exalts theory ‘no matter what’ in the face of hard, cold facts.”
• “Robinson‐Patman has 31 not ushered in a bizarre rule of law that exalts theory ‘no matter what’ in the face 14 No. 12‐4689‐cv 1 of hard, cold facts.”
• reasons for small number of lost customers varied, 17 suggesting no competitive injury
• harm to competition all that matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).