Skip to main content
· 5/25/1993

David M. Pruett v. Charles Thompson

Citations

  • 996 F.2d 1560
  • 1993 WL 173797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if basis for alleged cause is barred, then cause itself is procedurally defaulted
  • holding counsel was not ineffective for failing to further investigate a theory after counsel had good cause to believe the theory was incredible
  • holding counsel was not ineffective for failing to further investigate a theory after counsel had good cause to believe the theory was incredible
  • holding counsel was not ineffective for failing to further investigate a theory after counsel had good cause to believe the theory was incredible
  • observing that a “hearing could not remedy [petitioner’s] procedural default” of a habeas claim
  • The award of “a preliminary injunction is a drastic and extraordinary remedy that is not to be routinely granted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Widener, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.