David M. Mumford v. David A. Basinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an Ohio common pleas court was an arm of the state and a claim against a judge of that court was a claim against the state
• concluding that an Ohio common pleas court was an arm of the state and a claim against a judge of that court was a claim against the state
• concluding that an Ohio common pleas court was an arm of the state and a claim against a judge of that court was a claim against the state
• concluding that an Ohio common pleas court was an arm of the state and a claim against a judge of that court was a claim against the state
• holding that a division of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas “is an instrumentality of the State of Ohio and is, under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, absolutely immune from suit in this Court”
• noting that a state court is not a 10 “person” under § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).