Skip to main content
· 1/4/1999

David M. Lyons and United Transportation Union v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company

Citations

  • 163 F.3d 466
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11
  • 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2133
  • 1999 WL 2020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it is not whether the arbitrator erred in interpreting the contract[,] *** it is whether [he] interpreted the contract”
  • \it is not whether the arbitrator erred in interpreting the contract *** it is whether [he] interpreted the contract\
  • “To remain within the scope of its jurisdiction, the essence of the [arbitra-torj’s decision must be contained in the terms of the agreement between the union and the employer.”
  • “Because we find that the [Board] interpreted the contract, its interpretation is conclusive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.