· 1/4/1999
David M. Lyons and United Transportation Union v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company
Citations
- 163 F.3d 466
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11
- 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2133
- 1999 WL 2020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is not whether the arbitrator erred in interpreting the contract[,] *** it is whether [he] interpreted the contract”
- \it is not whether the arbitrator erred in interpreting the contract *** it is whether [he] interpreted the contract\
- “To remain within the scope of its jurisdiction, the essence of the [arbitra-torj’s decision must be contained in the terms of the agreement between the union and the employer.”
- “Because we find that the [Board] interpreted the contract, its interpretation is conclusive”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.