David M. Brown and Carolyn W. Brown v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a significant and immediate decline in market price that is directly attributable to overflights strongly suggests such interference
• indicating that the navigable airspace is not itself a private property interest
• discussing Causby factors and the third factor’s requirement of “substantial” interference
• court noted that the Browns’ complaint was based on flights flying “less than 500 feet above ground level” over their property
• court noted that the Browns' complaint was based on flights flying \less than 500 feet above ground level\ over their property
• court noted that the Browns' complaint was based on flights flying \less than 500 feet above ground level\ over their property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).