Skip to main content
· 9/1/2016

David L. Savell v. Michael A. Duddy

Citations

  • 2016 ME 139
  • 147 A.3d 1179
  • 2016 Me. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n appellate brief that does not even try to engage the reasons the appellant lost has no pro- spect of success.”
  • “[A]n appellate brief that does not even try to engage the reasons the appellant lost has no prospect of success.”
  • “[A]n appellate brief that does not even try to engage the reasons the appellant lost has no pro- spect of success.”
  • “[A]n appellate brief that does not even try to engage the reasons the appellant lost has no prospect of success.”
  • “[A]n appellate brief that does not even try to engage the reasons the appellant lost has no prospect of success.”
  • “[A]n appellate brief that does not even try to engage the reasons the appellant lost has no pro- spect of success.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.